
Saturday, 19 March 2011
No news is not so good news

Sunday, 13 February 2011
Filming for Forgotten Reverie- Blackpool Bridge, Meltham 11th February 2011
This began in the rolling countryside of Yorkshire, at a hideaway picturesque location called Blackpool Bridge, near Digley Reservoir in Meltham. With the narrative of the poem, we wanted to create a dreamlike memory. of lost love and regret and we wanted to find somewhere that would evoke a melancholy mood.
After a very muddy and long walk through the Yorkshire countryside, we found the hidden gem of Blackpool Bridge and shot some footage there, along with the surrounding fields. This will be layered with some close ups.
Tuesday, 11 January 2011
Breathless in Paris
Tuesday, 28 December 2010
End of the year review
So here goes....
Top 5 films of the year
5)A Single Man (Tom Ford)A visually exquisite piece of cinema that was simultaneously poetry to the eyes as well as the ears. Restrained, absorbing and delicately shattering, Tom Ford's first feature film was a period film of style that also achieved substance, notably by Colin Firths subtly devastating portrayal of a man aching with grief yet finding beauty in the simplest of forms. Beautiful.
3) The Social Network ( David Fincher)
2) Inception ( Christopher Nolan)Tuesday, 2 November 2010
Tron Legacy Preview- 28th October 2010 IMAX, Bradford
After visiting the Bradford Media Museum website (as i so frequently do), I stumbled across a link to get tickets for a 23 minute preview of the new Tron Legacy film showing in 3D in the IMAX screen. Knowing how much my boyfriend Graham is anticipating this film, due to his love of the original (though with this brings an air of interpretation and hope that the legacy, ahem of the film will not be tarnished) and the bonus that Daft Punk are scoring the movie, I duly followed the instructions to get my hands on these coveted items.
And so, with ticket print out in our feverish mitts, we journeyed to the Media Museum in Bradford on a cold Thursday night to an eerily quiet Museum save for a collective of admittedly nerdy fanboys. We were told we could go up the IMAX, though once we went up the stairs, we had to join an already impressive queue (we ourselves were 30 + minutes early, see what i mean about fanboys). I have never been to something like this before and despite my fairly subdued interest in the film, compared to Graham's (and the fanboys) nervous excitement, I did find myself getting giddy with the prospect of being first to see the footage.
Once the doors were open, we took our seats as central as possible, to maximise enjoyment and donned our 3D specs, that were reminiscent to scuba goggles. As we waited we were surrounded by various conversations of film and learnt that if you had not seen The Dark Knight, you had not lived...apparently. And as the lights went down, we were greeted with a message, revealed in a typed online message style, slightly cheesy but nevertheless fun and reinforced the message that we were part of a select few to see the scenes first.The preview began and we were shown a few chapters, noting the scene numbers, of the movie, starting with a set up of the narrative to establish the cause and effect to come. Sam Flynn is told that his father may still be alive, having previously been lead to believe he had died years ago. He visits his fathers old Arcade and is transported into the Grid, this leading us up to a couple of snippets of the action sequences that surely must be the selling point of the film. And this is where the scenes came alive. Personally I am not a huge advocate of 3D, I believe that if it is done correctly then it can enhance and enrich a film, however I do not agree with the notion of recent times, that sees many films jumping the 3D band wagon as it is so hot right now. However if any film could prove the point of using 3D, I feel this may just be your movie. The 'Disc Wars' scene (which of course produced seat jerking excitement for the fanboys :) yes Graham including you) showcased the level of spectacle and depth that 3D can offer and the subsequent light cycles footage, had me fully caught up in the world of Tron and was simply like nothing I had even seen before, yet managing to retain the Neon/Dark aesthetics of the original.
When the film is released in December, it remains to be seen whether Tron Legacy will live up the hype and promise of the early footage. Yet if this is a case of style over substance, the viewers are surely in for one hell of a stylish treat. I feel that this will be truly maximised by seeing on the biggest loudest screen possible, if you are lucky to be near an IMAX, that should help. And for someone like myself, who is more a fan of intimate, restrained narratives, Tron Legacy will be a nice change and a chance to enjoy the pure spectacle of cinema.
Saturday, 25 September 2010
Review of Leaving Las Vegas

Ok.....so my friend Raj bought Leaving Las Vegas on DVD and needed to try to work out in her head what she had just seen. Knowing her usual film taste, this seemed somewhat of an odd choice for her to pick and she wanted to talk about this with someone else. The someone else being me. I have never personally watched the film before, despite its credentials, I just never felt the urge to watch it.
But being a dutiful friend, I felt I would give this a go and give her the much needed feedback she required. I had also just finished reading the Director Mike Figgis' book 'Digital Filmmaking' (an excellent read for amateur filmmakers) and due to my enjoyment of his book and the references to the film within the text, I thought it quite apt to give it a viewing.
Unfortunately as much as I wanted to like the film (due to my new admiration for Mr Figgis) I could not say it was an experience I enjoyed. And perhaps this is the point -a story about an alcoholic and his relationship with drink and a prositute he meets hardly screams feelgood factor. Yet for all the downbeat misery that the film evokes, there is much to admire within the frame. Figgis directs expertly creating a living neon nightmare for his protaganists, set within the backdrop of the garish faded soul of Las Vegas. The music (which Figgis was responsible for aswell as directing) enhances the narrative, the score mixing between bluesy jazz melancoly and sweet melodic sounds that almost conjures up shades of a lullaby.
Nicholas Cage went on to win the Oscar and all the plaudits for his portrayal of Ben, a man who is sleepwalking (or perhaps sleepdrinking) through life after his wife leaves him and he loses his job, his last goal in life, to literally drink himself to death. Yet to me, the heart of the film belonged to Elisabeth Shue as Sarah (or Sera as she likes to spell it), the prostitute, who wants to love and be loved in return. The cliche of the tart with the heart may loom, but Shue plays this with such conviction that an already depressing film, turns into near heartbreak as she cannot make her simple dream come true. She is the centre of the narrative, exuding compassion and empathy rather than the nihilistic Ben, whom she latches to when she is cast aside by her abusive pimp. Shue's character will remain in the memory when the films hangover has worn off.
Leaving Las Vegas is a difficult watch, there is no Hollywood ending and no cinematic gloss to comfort the viewer. It is the anti fairytale of girl meets boy, one where no one will be saved, though a form of redemption may be found for Sera. It is a bold, brave film but like an alcoholic beverage that you have overconsumed, it is one I would not re-stock in my booze cupboard.
Thursday, 12 August 2010
Hollywood & Women Pioneers
One could argue that in the early days of film, it was simply a matter of physicality that led men to dominate the area. With the first cameras being heavy and labourous, it was something a man could manouvuer that a woman could not. However thesedays with smaller kits and a bigger availibity this should surely address that issue?
The female’s relationship with cinema and her role within it has been a social struggle since the very origins of the film medium began. There was a need for better representation that was originally conceived onscreen, to go beyond preordained constructions of the female form and allow them a rightful position in the narrative rather than occupying screen space for their desirability. Though it was not only achievable if female filmmakers emerged, the industry certainly required, and deserved, the input of more women, who have been (and continue to be) in the minority of the studio workplace. From the early days of cinema, through the studio era to present day, women have been producing, writing and directing films, to create their own visual identity however much of the work they created has been lost or destroyed over time. Dorothy Arzner was a female director from 1922 to the 1940s who set a new a new standard for women in film by trying to push the subjective. Actress Ida Lupino, emerged as the most prolific of her time, deciding to take more creative control over the roles she was surrounded with. She created her own production company, to make films of a modest budget to tackle subjects that Hollywood rarely touched.
Returning to the modern day cinema, women are beginning to be recognised to co-inhabit the space on the screen and justifiably be more than visual stimulus. Yet as the movie business is finally taking those tentative steps towards bringing a social equality to the industry, they are still reluctant to lose the tradition of Hollywood. The ethos of the boy’s film club is still present in contemporary cinema with directing and the film spectator still being viewed as a primarily male area. www.indietalk.com/showreel states that only 4 of the top 100 films of 2005 were directed by women, and though they have begun to take more roles in the executive end of the movie business, they are still rarely chosen to direct.
Someone who is taking on the boys club and redefining the action genre is Kathryn Bigelow. Aside for the glaring fact that she is the first female to win the best director Oscar, there is much more to this filmmaker that deserves analysis. Key to Bigelow's position in comtemporary cinema is that she is has body of work that showcases her auteur stylistics, her famed action sequences and her playful genre-bending tendencies. She started as a painter and an artist and this is evident in her use of lighting and framing within scenes, she was also heavily influenced by Sam Peckinpah whose violent westerns would provide reference for her own films. Though she is known for her action films, Bigelow first appeared in avant garde films using these notions in her early work and she was associated with 1980s feminist cinema.
Kathryn Bigelow's first taste of cult success was with her 1987 film Near Dark, a Western/Vampire hybrid that also contained aspects of melodrama with the vampire family unit central to the plot. Her breakthrough movie was Point Break (1991) a action-heist-thriller in which an FBI agent Jonny Utah (Keanu Reeves) must uncover the culprits of a string of bank robberies by going uncover as a surfer and infiltrating the gang behind the crimes. Whilst doing so he becomes involved in an intense friendship with the leader of the gang Bodhi (Patrick Swayze)whom it transpires is behind the robberies. It is this aspect which turns the action picture off kilter and provides a new viewpoint for the audience, turning mainstream entertainment into a gender challenging male melodrama. It is the men who are objectified in this film, shot in some scenes in an almost fetishistic manner, particularly Bodhi who becomes the fixation for both Jonny and the audience, his hippy, yet masculine physic, complete with golden tresses becoming problematic for the hero of the piece. The only female character interestingly, is presented as a tomboy with an androgynous look complete with short cropped hair. Yet as Bigelow casts these characters and plays with the gender stereotyping, she still delivers the action sequences with aplomb, adapting her cameras to create fluid, rhythmic sequences. Bigelow manages to combine the concept of pure cinema, where it is simply to entertain and excite, but also with a subversion to challenge ideas of masculinity and femininity.



